Nutritional Value Evaluation of Banana Skin goroho (Moses acuminafe, sp) As Animal Feed by Fermentation With oligosporus Rhizopus and Trichoderma viride


Sri Suryaningsih Djunu , Siti Chuzaemi , Irfan H. Djunaidi , M. Halim Natsir ,

Download Full PDF Pages: 07-14 | Views: 409 | Downloads: 168 | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.3710757

Volume 4 - February 2020 (02)


The study aims to determine the effect of fermentation using Rhizopus oligosphorus and Trichoderma viride on banana peel Goroho nutritional quality. The research material is the feed material Goroho banana peel, the inoculum fermentation Rhizopus oligosphorus  and Trichoderma viride, A set of tools and materials for fermentation, a set of tools and materials proximate analysis, energy analysis and analysis gross β-carotene. The research method experiment using a completely randomized design (CRD) with 6 treatments 4 replications. The treatment consisted of P0: Banana skin Goroho without fermentation, P1: Rhizopus fermented banana skin Goroho oligosphorus 0.3%, 48-hour incubation, P2: The banana peel fermented GorohoTrichoderma viride 0.3% 120 hours of incubation, P3: Rhizopus fermented banana skin Goroho 0.15% oligosphorus further 48 hours incubation fermentation Trichoderma viride0.15% 120 hours of incubation, P4: Banana skin fermented Goroho Trichoderma viride 0.15% 120 hours of further incubation fermentation Rhizopus oligosphorus0.15% 48-hour incubation and P5: Rhizopus fermented banana skin Goroho oligosphorus 0.15% + Trichoderma viride0.15% 120 hours of incubation. The results showed Goroho fermented banana skinRhizopus oligosphorus and Trichoderma viride were significantly (P <0.01) in the best increase the content of BK amount of: 2.65% from 89.38 into 91.75% (P5), PK: 66.76%, from 6.47 be 10.79 (P5 ), LK: 107.62%, from 4.72 into 9.80% (P5), BETN: 3.28%, from 55.75 into 57.58% (P1), GE: 2.96% from 5290 increase to 5447 kcal / kg (P5), improve or degrade SK: 28.22% from 17.29 to 12.41% (P5) and not significant (P> 0.05) reduce the content of beta-carotene at 21.31 % ie from 0.61 to 0.48% at (P3).


Banana skin Goroho, fermentation, Rhizopus and Trichoderma viride oligosphorus.


i.        Son GH, Nurali.EJN, Koapaha.T, Passages. LE, 2012.Pembuatan Rice Flour-Based Analog Goroho Banana (Musa acuminate) with carboxymethyl celluloce binder (CMC) .Jurnal. Department of Agricultural Technology. Faculty Pertanianj UNSRAT, Manado.

ii.      Weu S., 2017. Quality Skin Nutrition Goroho Banana (Musa acuminafe, sp) fermented liquid Rumen With Different Incubation Lama. Thesis. Gorontalo State University. Department of Animal Husbandry. Faculty of Agriculture.

iii.    Tartrakoon, T., N. Chalearmsan, T. Vearasilp, and U. Meulen. 1999. The Nutritive Value Of Banana Peel (Musa sapientum L) In Growing Pigs. Reports Rajamangala Institute Of Technology, Phitsanulok Campus, Phitsanulok.

iv.     Hartadi, H., S. Reksohadiprodjo, S. Lebdosukojo and ADTilman. 2005. Table Composition Forage for Indonesia. Faculty of Animal Sciences University of Gadjah Mada. EFD program, Yogyakarta.

v.       Hernawati & A. Aryani. 2007. Flour banana peel as an alternative feed poultry. Character Grants Research Report. Institut Teknologi Bandung, Bandung.

vi.     McDonald, Henderson AR, Heron SJE. 1991. The Biochemistry Of Silage Chalcombe 2nd Ed Marlow.

vii.   Rogers, JM 2002. Diamond V xpTM DFM sets the standard in microbial feed technology. srelease / xp_dfm_aug2002.html,

viii. Fardiaz, S. 1992. Fermentation Technology. Department of Food Technology and Nutrition, Faculty of Agriculture, IPB. Bogor.

ix.     Fardiaz, S. 1987. Fermentation Physiology. Study Center, Bogor Agricultural University Institute of Information Resources, Bogor Agricultural University, Bogor.

x.       Sukaryana, Y. 2007. Optimizing Utilization Bungkil Kernel Oil, Cassava, and Onggok through Fermentation Technology with Different Molds For Poultry Feed Ingredients. Loporan Competitive Research Grant.

xi.     Nuraida, L., Niehaber, NLP, Winarno, Swandoko, GA, & Rahman, A. 1996. Influence of fermentation conditions on oil production molds Mucorinaequisporus M 05II / 4. Bul. Tech. And Food Industry, VII (I): 79-86.

xii.   Wang, DIC, Cooney, CI, and Demein, AL 1979. Fermentation and Enzymes Technology. John and Sons Inc., p. 468-472.

xiii. Wassef, MK 1977. Fungal Lipids. In. Paoletti, A. & Kritchersky, D. (Eds.). Advanced in Lipid Research. Academic Press. New York, p. 159-230.

xiv. Rahman, A. 1992. The industrial fermentation technology II. Arcan. Jakarta, 186 p.

xv.   Astuti, T., Sari, Y., & Zulkarnain. (2013). Effect of microorganism fermentation with local banana skin (moles) on a long ripening and MOL different sources on the content of the fiber fraction as animal feed. Applied science and technology journals, 7 (3), 19-25.

xvi. Mandels, M. 1970. Cellulases. In. GT Tsao (cd) Annual Report On Fermentation Processes. Vol. 5. Academic Press. New. York.

xvii.           Candraningtyas, OD, 2018. Effect of Lactobacillus casei Fermentation Bacteria Against Nutritional Value Wheat Yellow Pumpkin (Cucurbita moschata) Activity Test As well as β-carotene content as Anti Okdidant. Thesis. Study Program of Chemistry, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences. Indonesian Islamic University. Yogyakarta.

xviii.         Christi, RF, Rochana, A., Hernaman, I. 2016. Effects of Concentrated Fermentation Ingredients Against Gross Energy Crude Fiber and Crude Protein. Proceedings of the National Seminar on Sustainable Livestock 8. Indonesia.

Cite this Article: